Lowell Rocks Want to be a part of this? Become a member.
BrewMaster megret RobBreton coreybfromhooksett Princess Zo Michelle878 SteveD
Going out in LowellLowell Rocks Message Board and ForumListen to Lowell BandsTonight in Lowell

Hunting, what's your take on it?

solvocals
solvocals writes:
I was flipping through the channels the other day and I came across a hunting show. Now I'm a city boy (Lynn to be exact) so I've never been hunting. These two hics were looking at the absolutely gorgeous bear. I mean this thing was in it's prime, and these two clowns were stalking it. Then they start whispering things like, oh yeah, go for the chest. Then the guy shot him. I was horrified and honestly quite disgusted by the whole thing. Now, I'm no animal lover. I hate dogs, cats, fish anything like that. But this is freakin nature!! The way these guys grabbed a hold of the poor things head and were so "proud" of thier accomplishment.
I know some people may say that if people didn't hunt then we would be over-run with all kinds of animals. But does anyone think that maybe WE'RE the ones doing the over-running?
I'm not trying to make this an argument. I'm a firm believer in "Live and let live", even if you do enjoy taking to killing innocent animals.
And before anyone asks, yes I wear leather, yes I eat animals, no I'm not some kind of tree-hugger. I'm just trying to understand the logic behind it all.
3/26/2008 1:38:45 AM
Coven Of 13
Coven Of 13 writes:
I'm for hunting as long as you utilize all the animal for things like meat, clothing and the like. Hunting as a sport to just stuff a critter and put it on a wall, I'm against. I don't consider what they do sportsmanlike...shudder. I would rather those people take their marksmanship and put it to good use and shoot some Haji's (e.g., rag heads in the mid east-the bad ones).

There are a lot of people in other areas of our country that hunt and utilize all the parts, dry and freeze the meat. It's not only part of their culture but also their survival. If I had the ability to hunt deer (venison) and freeze it for my family and save on the grocery bill, I would do it.
3/26/2008 6:31:23 AM
Al
Al writes:
Sol, as far as the "logic" of hunting goes, I'll give you my philosophy... Which is more in line with the Native Americans .We are animals ourselves, and as such, share the earth together... So, all life is to be celebrated and respected. Killing animals has always been necessary for survival; and sorry to bum out the vegetarians, but it always will be. We're omnivores! That's not gonna change.
When I've had to take an animal's life, I take it seriously! That animal's life, to me, is no less important than my own! I should show deep respect that its' life has ensured my survival. The Sioux Indians would actually kneel and pray over a buffalo in total silence for several hours after a kill to pay homage to its life.
I don't think anyone should "enjoy" killing. Maybe that's what horrified you about watching the show... I don't know.
I will say this, though... The statement you made about not liking animals and then being horrified when you witnessed the killing of one definitely tells me why you can't wrap your brain around hunting. I can see that you have respect for life because you were bothered by what you witnessed. That's a great thing! Now if you can get to the next step; which is to develop a relationship with and "love" all of nature; then you'll have a better understanding.
3/26/2008 6:48:42 AM
BarbieK
BarbieK writes:
Well spoken, Runs from Bees.
3/26/2008 6:50:25 AM
Al
Al writes:
I respect bees! Listen, when I'm outnumbered like 500 to 1, I have ALOT OF RESPECT!!!
3/26/2008 6:53:44 AM
BarbieK
BarbieK writes:
lol ok. You are now Runs With Bees.
3/26/2008 6:55:49 AM
Erin
Erin writes:
Hunting makes people give me venison. Herego..... I'm for hunting. I just won't do it myself. lol
3/26/2008 6:57:43 AM
Al
Al writes:
Ah, My new Indian name?
3/26/2008 6:58:18 AM
Erin
Erin writes:
Runs with Bees is the best. :)
3/26/2008 7:00:06 AM
Al
Al writes:
I think Sol's post brings up a great point. Most people look at "Nature" through the glass... Like spectators... as though they're not part of it.
Maybe if we were more in touch, we wouldn't be f*cking up the planet so much?
3/26/2008 7:04:32 AM
Al
Al writes:
Runs with Bees has spoken! " Get off white ass... Hug tree... kiss big bear... and pray you not get face ripped off!"
3/26/2008 7:08:54 AM
BEEF
BEEF writes:
I don't have much problem with hunting. I don't really like hunting animals just so you have a stuffed trophy. One I was up in the Moosehead Lake area and I saw a hunter who had got himself a bear. the thing was the size of my brothers dog. That to me was a pretty stupid thing. I have not tried it myself but I have heard that bear meat is not the best tasting dues to its scavenging diet.
My brother and his friends are very avid hunters. The first thing everyone should know is that it is not that easy to go out in the woods and shoot a deer. It does take a certain skill.
To me venison, Elk, Caribou, Moose etc. has some of the best tasting and healthy meat there is. Again it takes a certain skill to help ensure that the meat, especially venison, does not taste gamey.
When the shit hits the fan and civilization falls apart I for one will get myself a 12 gauge and watch out Bambi.
3/26/2008 7:15:29 AM
Kennium
Kennium writes:
I guess I'd have to say that if I shot something I'd feel guilty, but that's ridiculous, because somebody had to kill the chicken I ate last night, and the hog that provided my bacon this morning.
We go to the store and buy these things and never even consider them as living things, only as food.

I'm not a hunter, but I am an avid fisherman. I catch and release most of my fish, and I eat the rest, especially trout or salmon.

Killing for fun or for showing how manly you are, doesn't make it for me, but if you're feeding yourself or your family that's cool.

When I lived in the lakes region of NH I often saw people drinking and hunting. That scared the hell out of me. Some dumb bastard with a Budwieser in one hand and a rifle in the other...often walking right through my backyard... I'm not for that kind of hunting.
3/26/2008 8:04:25 AM
Matt Fetters
Matt Fetters writes:
Many murderers start out killing animals when they're children.
3/26/2008 8:13:08 AM
BEEF
BEEF writes:
??WTF?
3/26/2008 8:15:27 AM
Matt Fetters
Matt Fetters writes:
"What if there was a species above us in the food chain? How do you think you'd feel if that species lost total respect for us... and started slaughtering us wholesale? "
3/26/2008 8:16:32 AM
Matt Fetters
Matt Fetters writes:
WTFWTFWTFWTF?????
3/26/2008 8:17:02 AM
Matt Fetters
Matt Fetters writes:
Seriously now. I like what Al said about your life being no more important than any other life. Respect for all life is the key but survival is a must. I would do it myself if I had to survive on my own.
3/26/2008 8:20:18 AM
Kennium
Kennium writes:
Plus shooting a hole in a stall is easier than drilling, right Matt?
3/26/2008 8:22:22 AM
Matt Fetters
Matt Fetters writes:
Kenny cheats when he hunts because he hides behind a divider, peeping through a glory hole before he makes hs kill.
3/26/2008 8:23:39 AM
Matt Fetters
Matt Fetters writes:
OMG KENNY. you beat me!!!!
3/26/2008 8:24:04 AM
BEEF
BEEF writes:
Bottom line is do you eat meat?
DO you have any leather clothing, shoes?
How about animals by products in almost all foods?
No one is immune to the food chain. Just being here has impacted nature and wild life habitats in many ways.
Al is very right and most people that I know who hunt have a great respect for the animals as well as nature in gernal. I have met many people who will diss hunting and then go have a cook out where they cook all kinds of animals that in reality where raised and dispatched in much worse ways than an animal that was hunted.
If there was a species above us it would suck indeed. But in keeping with that what should we eat? Grass? Grains? AHHH become one with the cows! Now I get it
3/26/2008 8:27:31 AM
chippa
chippa writes:
Nobody tell me what happens to veal-

I don't want to know-

it's too delicious
3/26/2008 8:32:07 AM
Matt Fetters
Matt Fetters writes:
I believe we should only eat meat from cows that have died from natural causes like old age oe something.
3/26/2008 8:35:24 AM
swanee
swanee writes:
Shouldn't Al be "Runs FROM Bees"?
3/26/2008 8:39:25 AM
Kennium
Kennium writes:
Here's a little hunting joke for ya:

uk.youtube.com/watch?v=xs3fus...
3/26/2008 8:40:08 AM
chippa
chippa writes:
I've made bear stew and its good by the way- a woman in my office killed one and brought me some meat- (big milhouse fan if that explains anything)

I reckon you wouldn't want a little one, but bear is good- I'm not sure the scavenger diet is a bad one- lobsters are crap eaters and they're delicious

I just know I wouldn't have the patience to sit in a tree all day waiting for something to walk by to shoot it like hunters do- I love the idea of it, but I know I would suck at hunting-

If you haven't had moose you should it hauls ass
3/26/2008 8:42:55 AM
Matt Fetters
Matt Fetters writes:
3/26/2008 8:43:42 AM
BEEF
BEEF writes:
Moose hauls ass indeed!
If you get the chance Elk and Caribou haul much ass also.
Chip to be honest if someone offered me some bear I'd try it.
Alligator is perty good too.
Thing that stops me from hunting: Time and field dressing. That is rough.
3/26/2008 8:46:10 AM
dog
dog writes:
Hunting doesn't interest me at all, but I have no problem with hunting.
3/26/2008 8:49:04 AM
chippa
chippa writes:
They serve alligator at the chain restaurants in LA- those are great- I'd also come across the occasional turtle soup which was awesome if it was done right

You know what's not so impressive- frog's legs
3/26/2008 8:49:29 AM
BEEF
BEEF writes:
Had them in the Florida Keys
they were tough
I am curious about Rattlesnake
Turtle soup eh?
This may throw for a loop but goat is not so good. Heavy duty game flavor.
3/26/2008 8:52:46 AM
JimZaroulis
JimZaroulis writes:
I have no problem with hunting, just hunters.

I'm not against the killing of animals for food, it's the circle of life. But I wouldn't put chicken's feet, cows horns, or fish heads on my wall.

3/26/2008 8:54:02 AM
chippa
chippa writes:
had some curried goat in Jamaica

lotsa bones, not so much meat

smart little bastards
3/26/2008 8:54:24 AM
chippa
chippa writes:
I had chicken's feet at dim sum the day before I got married

they suck
3/26/2008 8:54:59 AM
BEEF
BEEF writes:
Those Jamaican goats spend to much time with the spleefs. Makes em tough.
I have a problem with vegans who eat tofu shaped into the most unhealthy foods knows ie: Tofu Hot Dogs
WHat is with the ad for gay bars and clubs right below the last post? Hunters=gay? or CUrried goats are gay?
3/26/2008 8:58:20 AM
Darxis
Darxis writes:
I shot my first deer the first 4 hours I could legally hunt at 12. The training my grandfather gave me up until that age proved I was taught well. Guns and hunting takes extreme care and is real good eating. Most city kids never really get it from what I see. Happy Hunting everyone.
3/26/2008 9:03:37 AM
BarbieK
BarbieK writes:
Swanee, I originally named him Runs From Bees but I though Runs With Bees sounded a bit manlier.
3/26/2008 9:04:33 AM
Matt Fetters
Matt Fetters writes:
Kenny........Is that you? uk.youtube.com/watch?v=-x_f7a...
3/26/2008 9:12:40 AM
Big Daddy
Big Daddy writes:
I don't dig sport hunting--i think if you're gonna eat it, then go for it. If it's going to be a trophy, find a hot, young wife instead ;-)
3/26/2008 9:13:16 AM
G - MAN
G - MAN writes:
KILL OR BE KILLED
3/26/2008 9:13:20 AM
BEEF
BEEF writes:
Wife? I'd rather kill! LOL!!!
G-man jam this weekend?
3/26/2008 9:15:30 AM
G - MAN
G - MAN writes:
SAT/SUN GOOD WITH ME WTG
3/26/2008 9:19:53 AM
BEEF
BEEF writes:
Saturday times would be 2:30p if at your house
1:30 at mine
Sunday is up in the air.
3/26/2008 9:21:39 AM
Melvern Taylor
Melvern Taylor writes:
as a meat eater, i 'm ok with killing animals to eat them. but killing animals for fun is pretty fucked up.
3/26/2008 9:41:49 AM
ACME Music Trio
ACME Music Trio writes:
If you're easily offended or highly religious - move on. Don't read this.

I'm all for preservation of human life through common law, but the bottom line is, we are all primitive creatures with an innate ability to fend for ourselves and killing another creature is a part of that nature.

We are *Conditioned* through our upbringing and social agreement that "killing is wrong"... when in reality, it's really just unpleasant to accept and a primal part of our being. We just have adapted ourselves to adhere to SOCIAL CONSENSUS that we shouldn't do it.

I will try not to drag religion into this too-far (an early means of enforcing laws and guidelines that could not otherwise be enforced) but at some point in our evolution as we began to communicate better with our clans... we decided: "Okay... hey... if we want to survive as a collective group... we need to NOT kill each-other..." and rules began to emerge.

Yet it was perfectly okay to slaughter opposing clans or tribes.

We then began to place hierarchical value to other living creatures over time. Sure... it's fine to swat a mosquito or to be oblivious to the fact that you're crushing ants by the dozens on any given walk through a field... but cows & chickens are yummy. MMmmm... let's kill 'em.

Then we began placing emotional hierarchy on other animals: Dogs could be trained to help with herding and became an integral part of family/village lives... soon to segue into becoming domesticated "pets" that served ONLY to provide companionship...

But let's cut the crap. There's no difference fundamentally between a ladybug, a mouse, a pigeon, a cat a dog, a goat, a chicken, a cow, a bear, a tuna, a dolphin, a whale...

Species have evolved and died-off for millions of years. It's a FACT of life. NO species is immune from extinction, and extinction itself IS a part of the bigger picture.

I agree with people when they ask: "Well... why is tuna okay to collect and eat, but not dolphin...?"

You may HATE the idea of the brutality involved with clubbing a baby harp seal for its pelt... but guess what...? It's been done for centuries. Look what bears and sharks do to them. Is that any less brutal...? Should we be pissed at bears...? Oh, wait... that's right... we're cursed with the ability to "reason" and empathize with the other creature(s) and put our emotions in the way of the truth.

The truth is, our "civilized" culture is a house of cards.

It would not take much AT ALL for our well-woven sets of rules to unravel. If we were to get hit with some celestial magnetic pulse that immediately wiped-out all things electrical... no power-plants... no communication... no electricity... no refrigerators... no lights... no tv... no radio... NO WAY OF KNOWING WHAT'S GOING ON... I guarantee that after 3-4 weeks of us "attempting" to hold our standards of civilization, our cultures would crumble and the instinct to survive will kick in and people will kill each other over food... shelter... safety... I am convinced that our illusion of civility would crumble WELL within months without any form of order.

All of a sudden, dogs would look a little more appetizing, you...

well...

I guess I could go all gloom & doom here... but my point is, everything you know about right & wrong is conditioning. We suppress those instincts at a VERY young age. We reprimand young boys who "hit" or fight with other kids. Releasing aggression is JUST as natural a reflex as crying, eating, sex and going to the bathroom. We all just decided that as long as we want to make this work "together"... we need to squash those natural urges.
3/26/2008 9:58:30 AM
milhouse
milhouse writes:
yup. killing for fun is weird.

killing as Runs with Bees says, is circle of life n shit.


now, i did eat at Carnivore in Nairobi, they serve game meat culled by rangers in the safari parks...

nothing beats a little wildebeast, elan, ostridge & zebra... or what ever they are culling that day on Massai swords.

africanmeccasafaris.com/kenya...
3/26/2008 9:58:37 AM
Rick Roy
Rick Roy writes:
Al, I thought your Indian name was "Tall Thin Chinnuts"? Anyway, I don't care to hunt, but love steak, so I'm a meat hipocrit right up front. To me the only reason to hunt is to survive, and would do it if I had to. I only respect hunters who go after animals that can kill them. Not deer. Sorry.
3/26/2008 9:59:04 AM
G - MAN
G - MAN writes:
NEXT WEEK PERHAP'S DUECE G-08
3/26/2008 10:23:57 AM
JimZaroulis
JimZaroulis writes:
Sharpshooting targets and clay pigeons from 1000 yards away is pretty skillful and impressive.

Hiding in a tree, fully camouflaged, baiting an animal with mating calls, decoy's, scents, taking it out when it's in view, and then calling that skill? Uh........no.
3/26/2008 10:27:27 AM
milhouse
milhouse writes:
it takes skill if you are 48 pounders into it.
3/26/2008 10:37:32 AM
JimZaroulis
JimZaroulis writes:
And for the record, I love venison, especially in a stew.

Good eats.
3/26/2008 10:39:09 AM
dbk
dbk writes:
I am with you Jim... would like to see a Cage Match with a pissed off grizzly and hunter. He gets one bullet and a buck knife...no thats a sport!
3/26/2008 10:41:01 AM
JimZaroulis
JimZaroulis writes:
I don't want to be labeled as some bleeding heart anti-hunting nut, I just don't see the "sport" in killing animals. Roughing it for a week with the guys in a log cabin and eating the deer they shot sounds like it would be alot of fun. Living off the land is impressive, how it's done doesn't need to be sensationalized.
3/26/2008 10:51:35 AM
BEEF
BEEF writes:
Back up
I know quite a few hunters and you would be surprised at how many trips result in nothing
If you actually see a deer and then actually shoot it and hit it you then have to track it etc.
I guarantee most on here who diss it as involving no skill couldn't even hit a deer 20' away.
Again all of the hunters I know hunt for the thrill of the hunt and ultimately for the meat and hides.
3/26/2008 10:54:01 AM
chippa
chippa writes:
Com eon now-

you people belittle something you know nothing about-

like Nascar- I find nothing redeemable about it, wouldn't watch it for money but I reckon the guys driving those things are pretty skilled at something or some other guys would do it-

I bet there's some skill and patience, craftsmanship- something that makes a hunter a good hunter-

To poo poo hunting as something that doesn't take any skill to me is akin to someone saying writing an opera is impressive but putting on a witty T-shirt and jumping around like a fag playing three chords and calling that talent? Uh.......no
3/26/2008 10:54:26 AM
chippa
chippa writes:
WTG Labeef

testify brother
3/26/2008 10:55:40 AM
BEEF
BEEF writes:
ahem *MOOOOOOOO!!!*
3/26/2008 10:57:10 AM
Erin
Erin writes:
It'd be the same as someone who's never played and instrument or sang to say that it's eays to sit at a piano and belt out covers all night.
3/26/2008 11:21:24 AM
chippa
chippa writes:
that's what I just f*cking said
3/26/2008 11:23:30 AM
BarbieK
BarbieK writes:
Yeah, come on. All that camoflauge gear and skunk piss-scented human odor eliminator doesn't apply itself yanno.
3/26/2008 11:25:49 AM
swanee
swanee writes:
If God didn't want us to hunt and eat animals then why did he make the out of meat?
3/26/2008 11:26:48 AM
BarbieK
BarbieK writes:
LOL yeah Swanee, those farm raised organic chickens you eat are tricky to track down.
3/26/2008 11:28:53 AM
chippa
chippa writes:
Not a lot of organic chicken in those BK fish sandwiches
3/26/2008 11:29:45 AM
chippa
chippa writes:
If a four guys hold down a deer and then one guy walks up to it and shoots it in the face, where's the skill in that?
3/26/2008 11:32:07 AM
Erin
Erin writes:
the skill is the 1st guy who tackles the deer chip
3/26/2008 11:36:13 AM
swanee
swanee writes:
I know a guy who is a duck hunter. I told him it would just be easier and quicker to find the nest and break the little duck eggs.

Saves everyone time.
3/26/2008 11:37:14 AM
chippa
chippa writes:
I hunt at night at the petting zoo connected to Southwick with my bare hands
3/26/2008 11:47:59 AM
JimZaroulis
JimZaroulis writes:
I'm not going to get in a discussion about what "skill" is, but to compare hunting and playing music................let's just not do that.
3/26/2008 11:48:24 AM
chippa
chippa writes:
and by bare hands I mean with a bat
3/26/2008 11:48:28 AM
chippa
chippa writes:
Jim, why not, because it's your area of expertise?

Could you compare playing music to playing football?
3/26/2008 11:49:33 AM
chippa
chippa writes:
and by bat I mean with a giant f*cking rifle
3/26/2008 11:51:21 AM
swanee
swanee writes:
Survelliance photo of Chip at Southwick Zoo.
us.movies1.yimg.com/movies.ya...
3/26/2008 11:55:27 AM
JimZaroulis
JimZaroulis writes:
Well......

I have never played a basson.
If you handed me one, and I tried my best to get a note out of it, I would kindly hand it back to you and say, I cannot do this. Give me 2 or 3 years and I'll work hard to try and play it better.

I've never killed anything.
If I fired a gun at an innocent bystander 20 feet away and blew their brains out, did I display an act of skill?

I'm getting hungry. I have a Market Basket Roaster in the fridge that has my name on it.

I know it probably was difficult to chase the chicken and break it's neck, but the real skill is getting the cellophane off. Man, they wrap them so tight!
3/26/2008 12:01:39 PM
JimZaroulis
JimZaroulis writes:
And I meant to say "Bassoon".
3/26/2008 12:02:15 PM
chippa
chippa writes:
Yeah but that doesn't sound like you're COMPARING the two things-

If you fire a gun at an innocent bystander 20 feet away and blow their brains out that's not hunting

just like when I get drunk and sign up for karaoke and pick "White Christmas" and when they give me the mic I just yell "I SH*T BLOOD EVRYWHERE" it's not skill

Read Darxis' post way up about the first time he went hunting at 12 or so (Sorry to drag you into it unbeknowst Alger) There's a tremendous amount of skill and preparation and knowledge and patience and all that

just like there is when you take music seriously
3/26/2008 12:08:57 PM
BarbieK
BarbieK writes:
All in all, I'd really like to see Chippa's drunk karaoke.
3/26/2008 12:12:32 PM
La Soule Fontaine
has anybody here seen the documentary about the moron who decided to "live with the grizzlies"? Nature can give as good as it gets!
3/26/2008 12:13:28 PM
milhouse
milhouse writes:
actually i've seen chippa do that at karoke, and i've also seen swanee do it, and chippa's way better at it.

not just anyone can carry that.
3/26/2008 12:13:45 PM
JimZaroulis
JimZaroulis writes:
Again, I am not trying to condescend anyone's hobbies or interests. I said that I have nothing against hunting. Hun-TERS who kill for the sake of killing is different. I'm sure everything takes some sort of skill. But to compare it to mastering an instrument is apples and bowling balls. You're right it doesn't sound like I'm comparing the two things because you can't.

Hey, the thread says "Hunting, what's your take on it".
That's my take.

Now I'm going to PAR-take in eating fowl.
3/26/2008 12:16:54 PM
chippa
chippa writes:
OK but I'll put strictnine in the guacamole

You can't compare hunting to mastering an instrument

I would argue that you could compare mastering crossbow buck hunting to mastering piano

that's my take

take that
3/26/2008 12:21:00 PM
Darxis
Darxis writes:
Hunting taught correctly is better for everyone. Life long lessons have been learned from it for me and many others. The food part is also good. Nothing like Venisin stew. Bear is a little gamey to me. Hunting also teaches gun safety which is number 1.
3/26/2008 12:24:24 PM
JimZaroulis
JimZaroulis writes:
I tell you what.

I'll shoot arrows with a crossbow at a piano at 100 yards, then we'll be even.:)

Now get your arse to Jasmine Palace next week so you can hear us croon some VH tunes.
3/26/2008 12:25:21 PM
Captain Morgan
Captain Morgan writes:
I think I'm with ACME back there. I always was in favor of hunting. Then I watched one of those hunting shows, and I realized my mother's anti-gun talk, and my natural inclination toward Woody Allen style urbanism had a huge effect on me, because I couldn't even handle watching the guy shoot a bird, or a deer without cringing and thinking he was barbaric.
But my acquired distaste for it is simply silly. I eat animals. I wear animals. My knee jerk revulsion to hunting on TV (and obviously in real life) is hypocritical.

God bless those camouflage wearing beer bellied weekend Rambos, they're closer to being natural men than I am. And if the shit ever hits the fan, they'll have a much bigger clue on how to survive than I will.
3/26/2008 12:29:08 PM
chippa
chippa writes:
That is so f*cking far away from house it's gay

plus I thought you were just f*cking with me about the VH thing-
Next week is a definite no, but I do aim to get out to one of those sonofabitchers
3/26/2008 12:29:14 PM
chippa
chippa writes:
I think ACME painted with some pretty broad strokes though

To say the only difference between humans and the rest of the alive stuff on the planet is the "curse" of reason- that's a huge building block for his argument, and I think there's a few other differences
3/26/2008 12:33:15 PM
JimZaroulis
JimZaroulis writes:
It's the "You don't mind me serving you steaks as long as you don't know how I slaughter the cows" adage.

Severed animals heads as trophies though?.......eh.......but that's just me.
3/26/2008 12:35:08 PM
BEEF
BEEF writes:
Skull F*ck them
typical Lowellrocks arguement
3/26/2008 12:41:10 PM
Captain Morgan
Captain Morgan writes:
Oh, like cats don't bring the heads of mice home as trophies to lay at our feet?

Unless we're from another planet, as some have theorized, we're animals like the rest of the planet's animals.
3/26/2008 12:41:21 PM
Big Daddy
Big Daddy writes:
Honestly, it should be mandatory that every household have a gun and everyone in the house over the age of 11 be trained to use it. Gun control should mean making the headshot...

To counter JZ's hunting vs. music scenario, I can't play piano to save my life, but i could figure out how to play Mary Had a Little Lamb--I would put shooting an innocent bystander 20 feet away on the same level

Mary had a little lamb...and it was tasty!
3/26/2008 12:41:34 PM
Captain Morgan
Captain Morgan writes:
Which part is a typical LowellRocks debate?
Is someone using a Variax shot gun?
Where does math come into this?
Is Amy Winehouse hunting again?

:-)
3/26/2008 12:42:37 PM
Captain Morgan
Captain Morgan writes:
What key is "Kill Da Wabbit" in?
3/26/2008 12:43:26 PM
JimZaroulis
JimZaroulis writes:
I tend to put myself alot higher on the food chain than a cat.
Some cats are actually smarter than the "Elmer Fudd" types.

I've been called an animal, but I am not an animal.

"I am not an animal, I am a man"
John Merrick "The Elephant Man".
3/26/2008 12:46:51 PM
Captain Morgan
Captain Morgan writes:
Ahh, but you concede there IS a food chain and that you are just part of it. Considering the fact that an animal WOULD eat you, you are just part of the food chain, considering that worms eat us, we should probably take a second look at this so called hierarchy theory regarding the food chain.

There are dogs, cats, fish, birds, humans, etc. and we're all animals. Luckily, we're the animals who came up with guns first.
3/26/2008 12:51:48 PM
riffdaddy
riffdaddy writes:
Hunting for food in most cases isn't even necessary. But in cases where it is of course it's survival of the fittest. But if your gun jams and that bear shreads you ass to pieces then hey that's survival of the fittest too. What I can't stand is hunting for sport where some egotistical bastard get's all jacked up from shooting an animal from 50 yards away through a precision sight scope and with a rifle that could pick-off a fly from 100 yards. I know it takes skill but come on, please.
3/26/2008 12:55:58 PM
Big Daddy
Big Daddy writes:
There's a double entendre in there somewhere...
3/26/2008 12:57:57 PM
chippa
chippa writes:
no sh*t

good point

what a f*cking egotistical pussy
3/26/2008 12:59:09 PM
JimZaroulis
JimZaroulis writes:
My point exactly Riff.

Shotguns to hunt pheasants? Come on! You can aim anywhere BUT at the pheasant and you still have a good chance of hitting it.

3/26/2008 12:59:30 PM
Juice
Juice writes:
The primal instinct is in all of us. If we choose to cultivate a more domestic version of ourselves to be more civilized we also adopt the other burdens of that.

The reason why deer and other hunted animals would overrun our comunities is because we destroyed all of the natural predators that were in fact a threat to us not particularly choosing to add us to their food chain. But oppurtunity and survival will force actions not usually favored.

Coyotes and mountain lions and wolves have been known to attack children if not grown human beings. So we naturally remove the threat of them and in it's place have nothing to balance the natural food chain.

That same thrill that would draw people by the thousands to staduims to once watch human slaughter from galdiators to bull fighting to fighting hungry lions.

All of that has been replaced with sports like football games.

Yet territorial distputes even today still result with dieing humans despite the civilized rules of engagement. The end result remains the same.

It's hard to say if changing the natual order of things really benefit us. Meat that is captured in the wild is actually quite healthy for us. While we have developed many ways to civilize ourselves through farming animals for consumption, we've also have adopted some wied ways of doing it like using Chicken crap to feed Cows.

Technology has both saved us and cursed us with diseases and allergies that we then need to depend on technology to try to save us from ourselves.

You would think we were better off until you find out of course you happen to suffer or even die from something that has never been known to nature before.

If civilization were to become so screwed up and maybe not even by our own doing such as a natural disaster. Knowing how to survive could prove to be a valuable asset to you and your family.
3/26/2008 1:00:28 PM
JimZaroulis
JimZaroulis writes:
Why are humans the only "animal" that kills for something other than survival?
3/26/2008 1:00:43 PM
JimZaroulis
JimZaroulis writes:
Probably the same reason we mate for reasons other than mating.
3/26/2008 1:01:37 PM
JimZaroulis
JimZaroulis writes:
Please tell me the reason is math.
3/26/2008 1:01:57 PM
Big Daddy
Big Daddy writes:
I think the reason is because it tastes good
3/26/2008 1:02:57 PM
riffdaddy
riffdaddy writes:
I don't believe we're the only species that mates for the fun of it. Just take a look at a dog humoing on some furniture or someones leg. They look like they're having a blast to me.
3/26/2008 1:07:30 PM
milhouse
milhouse writes:
i'm pretty sure that to the uninitiated, hitting a moving target wiith a gun is pretty fkin hard.

3/26/2008 1:08:19 PM
Matt Fetters
Matt Fetters writes:
Really Jim? I thought we just mated to make babies. That's why I don't mate. Cause I don't want babies.
3/26/2008 1:08:45 PM
JimZaroulis
JimZaroulis writes:
Leather couches are the best...............oh wait.........well......so what?
3/26/2008 1:08:51 PM
Juice
Juice writes:
"Why are humans the only "animal" that kills for something other than survival?"

JZ do you even get the Discovery Channel?

Killer Whales toy and torture seals and don't eat them all the time.

When a leading pack animal overthrows the hierachy he will eat or kill all the baby animals if they were not made by him while the mother will just look on.

That is a natural occurrence.

Polar bears who are not pack animals will often kill any young polar bear for really no reason at all.
3/26/2008 1:09:49 PM
Matt Fetters
Matt Fetters writes:
Kill it if it moves!!!!!!!
3/26/2008 1:10:56 PM
Juice
Juice writes:
And then there is the territorial issue in the animal kingdon.
3/26/2008 1:11:41 PM
Big Daddy
Big Daddy writes:
Any polar bear touches my kids, their getting "two in the hat"...
3/26/2008 1:15:20 PM
dog
dog writes:
"Honestly, it should be mandatory that every household have a gun and everyone in the house over the age of 11 be trained to use it. Gun control should mean making the headshot..."

I'd be a lawbreaker then. I don't like guns and don't one in my house. I have no problem with gun ownership, but I don't want to be told I have to have one.

Hunting, like practically anything has aspects that require skill and aspects that require no skill. And there will be people who partake at high skill activities (I'm thinking stuff like deer hunting with a bow) and those who partake at low skill levels (squirrel hunting with a shotgun. AND there will be people who hunt for the thrill of the chase, regardless of whether they kill something and those who just to kill animals.
3/26/2008 1:22:41 PM
ACME Music Trio
ACME Music Trio writes:
CHIPPA - You are correct, those were VERY broad strokes and I know there's a LOT that distinguishes "us" over other animals... but there's just not the time to type-out THAT GRANULAR of an argument.

The crux of my point is - in the BIG BIG picture, our rules and fears are about SLELF preservation... of HUMANS. We want to stop "global warming" because it will REALLY inconvenience us when 20-miles inward of all coastline becomes beachfront... All this guff about ozone... pollutants... usage of fossil fuels, etc... if/when humans disappear from this planet, the eco-system will self-correct itself. The water will clear, the air will clear, balance will be restored. The planet doesn't need saving - WE do.

Why do I mention that...? Because again, we are merely ONE of an amazing number of species that lives on this planet and as much as our self-awareness BELIEVES we are important to keeping the world in-order... we are nothing. Once we're gone, other creatures will continue-on with THEIR built-in, instinctual skills to survive - and with a lot of species that are carnivores and omnivores, killing comes naturally.

Even in docile passive animals that are vegetarian, the instinct to kill for protection of self or newborns is there. We were born to be combative and kill. We've just taught ourselves not to because it's unacceptable in our culture.

I wish I could peer into the future 2,000 years and see what the condition of this planet is... what the dominant species are... whether there is intelligence... technology... etc.
3/26/2008 1:30:49 PM
ACME Music Trio
ACME Music Trio writes:
and for the record... I am NOT a "gun" person. I think the NRA uses loopholes and terminology to its advantage and exploits it.

There is NO NEED for any civilian to be able to legally own military-grade high-powered assault weapons. It's just ridiculous.
3/26/2008 1:33:42 PM
ACME Music Trio
ACME Music Trio writes:
Oh... and I almost spit-out my coffee reading Chippa's comment about screaming: "I $#IT BLOOD EVERYWHERE" over the microphone.
3/26/2008 1:36:18 PM
milhouse
milhouse writes:
who the hell would want to own a girlscout-grade low powered assault rife?

in for a penny in for a pound. don't cheap out on your assault rifle ACME, you'll just end up buying it twice.
3/26/2008 1:55:35 PM
La Soule Fontaine
I like Ted Nugent
3/26/2008 1:59:42 PM
milhouse
milhouse writes:
ted is fantastic.
3/26/2008 2:00:52 PM
Coven Of 13
Coven Of 13 writes:
Gimme a SAW or a 50-cal along with tanning supplies and a big freezer....I'm all set. Heck I would make stuff out of the bones. Waste not want not.

We are all part of the circle of life (damn Lion King movie coming to mind). Just be respectful.
3/26/2008 2:04:20 PM
Kennium
Kennium writes:
I have a question.

Do vegan girls swallow?
3/26/2008 2:05:14 PM
Big Daddy
Big Daddy writes:
"There is NO NEED for any civilian to be able to legally own military-grade high-powered assault weapons. It's just ridiculous."

I couldn't disagree more. Like the old adage says, "when guns are outlawed, only outlaws will have guns." Who has assault rifles? Of course, the Police and Military--who should--and gangs, terrorists, and nutjobs.

In short, if we all have full access to assault weapons, it will skews the statistics in a more favorable light, thus further making my case that guns are fabulous ;-)
3/26/2008 2:38:09 PM
Juice
Juice writes:
""There is NO NEED for any civilian to be able to legally own military-grade high-powered assault weapons. It's just ridiculous.""

Exactly, Assault weapons are design for population control. Civilians should never have a say as to who lives or dies. They will always choose themselves, the selfish bastards.

China has a much better way of controlling their population.

It's called "after birth" control.
3/26/2008 2:43:05 PM
Arte K
Arte K writes:
Assault weapons are chicken feed. You're not taking this all the way to its logical conclusion.

I'm sending my kids into Nuclear Engineering, and we're going to amass our own ICBM arsenal. It's the only way to protect the citizenry from an overzealous government.
3/26/2008 3:08:27 PM
Arte K
Arte K writes:
Good thing I'm not a nut job, huh?!
3/26/2008 3:09:27 PM
BarbieK
BarbieK writes:
well...
3/26/2008 3:15:34 PM
Berklee Bill
Berklee Bill writes:
Hunting is awesome!! Waterfowling is my favorite (ducks, geese, shit that flys). Hunting squirrels is fun, too - cuz they're annoying little fucks. I've been deer hunting before -- kind of boring and not really my thing.

I will say this -- I like bears and wolves and would never hunt them. They should be left alone. Everything else sucks and is fair game.
3/26/2008 3:37:08 PM
Erin
Erin writes:
so you're point Bill is that yu hunt bc animals suck? Good point.... way to make this NOT look like a redneck hick argument....
3/26/2008 3:43:46 PM
dog
dog writes:
Bill is a big tractor pull fan, too, I'd guess. ;)

3/26/2008 4:10:35 PM
chippa
chippa writes:
I hate when motherf*ckers cut and paste, but somebody JUST sent me this:

I had this idea that I was going to rope a deer, put it in a stall, feed it up on corn for a couple of weeks, then kill it and eat it.



The first step in this adventure was getting a deer. I figured that, since they congregate at my cattle feeder and do not seem to have much fear of me when we are there (a bold one will sometimes come right up and sniff at the

bags of feed while I am in the back of the truck not 4 feet away), it should not be difficult to rope one, get up to it and toss a bag over its head (to calm it down) then hog tie it and transport it home.



I filled the cattle feeder then hid down at the end with my rope.



The cattle, having seen the roping thing before, stayed well back. They were not having any of it.



After about 20 minutes, my deer showed up -- 3 of them. I picked out.. ...a likely looking one, stepped out from the end of the feeder, and threw.. ..my rope. The deer just stood there and stared at me.



I wrapped the rope around my waist and twisted the end so I would have a good hold. The deer still just stood and stared at me, but you could tell it was mildly concerned about the whole rope situation.



I took a step towards it...it took a step away. I put a little tension on the rope and then received an education.



The first thing that I learned is that, while a deer may just stand there looking at you funny while you rope it, they are spurred to action when you start pulling on that rope.



That deer EXPLODED.



The second thing I learned is that pound for pound, a deer is a LOT stronger than a cow or a colt. A cow or a colt in that weight range I could fight down with a rope and with some dignity.



A deer-- no chance.



That thing ran and bucked and twisted and pulled. There was no controlling it and certainly no getting close to it. As it jerked me off my feet and started dragging me across the ground, it occurred to me that having a deer

on a rope was not nearly as good an idea as I had originally imagined.



The only up side is that they do not have as much stamina as many other animals.



A brief 10 minutes later, it was tired and not nearly as quick to jerk me off my feet and drag me when I managed to get up. It took me a few minutes to realize this, since I was mostly blinded by the blood flowing out of the big gash in my head. At that point, I had lost my taste for corn-fed venison. I just wanted to get that devil creature off the end of that rope.



I figured if I just let it go with the rope hanging around its neck, it would likely die slow and painfully somewhere.



At the time, there was no love at all between me and that deer. At that moment, I hated the thing, and I would venture a guess that the feeling was mutual.



Despite the gash in my head and the several large knots where I had cleverly arrested the deer's momentum by bracing my head against various large rocks as it dragged me across the ground, I could still think clearly enough to

recognize that there was a small chance that I shared some tiny amount of responsibility for the situation we were in, so I didn't want the deer to have to suffer a slow death, so I managed to get it lined back up in between my truck and the feeder - a little trap I had set before hand...kind of like a squeeze chute.



I got it to back in there and I started moving up so I could get my rope back.



Did you know that deer bite? They do! I never in a million years would have thought that a deer would bite somebody, so I was very surprised when I reached up there to grab that rope and the deer grabbed hold of my wrist.



Now, when a deer bites you, it is not like being bit by a horse where they just bite you and then let go. A deer bites you and shakes its head --almost like a pit bull. They bite HARD and it hurts.



The proper thing to do when a deer bites you is probably to freeze and draw back slowly. I tried screaming and shaking instead. My method was ineffective.



It seems like the deer was biting and shaking for several minutes, but it was likely only several seconds.



I, being smarter than a deer (though you may be questioning that claim by now) tricked it.



While I kept it busy tearing the tendons out of my right arm, I reached up with my left hand and pulled that rope loose. That was when I got my final lesson in deer behavior for the day.



Deer will strike at you with their front feet. They rear right up on their back feet and strike right about head and shoulder level, and their hooves are surprisingly sharp.



I learned a long time ago that, when an animal -- like a horse --strikes at you with their hooves and you can't get away easily, the best thing to do is try to make a loud noise and make an aggressive move towards the animal. This will usually cause them to back down a bit so you can escape.



This was not a horse. This was a deer, so obviously, such trickery would not work. In the course of a millisecond, I devised a different strategy.



I screamed like a woman and tried to turn and run.



The reason I had always been told NOT to try to turn and run from a horse that paws at you is that there is a good chance that it will hit you in the back of the head.



Deer may not be so different from horses after all, besides being twice as strong and 3 times as evil, because the second I turned to run , it hit me right in the back of the head and knocked me down.



Now, when a deer paws at you and knocks you down, it does not immediately leave. I suspect it does not recognize that the danger has passed. What they do instead is paw your back and jump up and down on you while you are laying there crying like a little girl and covering your head.



I finally managed to crawl under the truck and the deer went away.



So now I know why when people go deer hunting they bring a rifle with a scope to sort of even the odds
3/26/2008 4:19:20 PM
Captain Morgan
Captain Morgan writes:
I hunt tractors, they hold up traffic here in NH, AND, they're an easy target.

PS. Big Daddy is right!
3/26/2008 4:20:15 PM
milhouse
milhouse writes:
fair fights are overated.
3/26/2008 4:54:58 PM
In My Soul
In My Soul writes:
Deers do fight back just watch this

uk.youtube.com/watch?v=6cqxg0...

I hunt and it is not easy. The people that say it is, are not hunters, but people who really don't know what it takes to track. It's an art form. And If you think just sit in a stand and wait till they come by and shoot. Experienced hunters still don't make the shot, that some think are so easy.

I agree that hunting just to brag or pound your chest after the kill and not eat the meat or utilize the hides is a waste. I hunt for the love of tracking and experience the wilderness, and when I didn't want the kill cause I already had enough meat. I tracked with a camera. And I used to most of the time hunt with a bow even through shot gun and rifle season because it took more skill, but that’s just me.

For those who think that some one should not own a specific type of weapon. Who is to say what one person should or shouldn’t enjoy as a recreation sport in target shooting or what ever it is that gives them pleasure as long as they enjoy in a respectful manner. How would you like it if someone denied you what you love, collecting stamps, woodworking, rocket building, Riding an ATV at the age of 15 etc. Is this not America? For the record, most weapons that people are so up in arms about banning (again remember there are not automatic weapons) I can show you a hundred completely legal rifles with the same or comparable caliber weapon with the same type of round and fire power. They just look different. The only difference is the capacity of rounds that each can hold. If you don’t like them, then don’t own them, but don’t tell me I can’t because you have different beliefs or values. Isn’t that why we came to America in the 1st place?

JZ wasn’t that you said something about shooting a piano with a cross bow? Any time you want just let me know, I have a 225lb compound cross bow (And if you don‘t know, that is powerful). I’d like to see if afterwards you still think it’s as easy as you think?

I understand why people love the Live Free or Die state. At one time we had a country like this, what happened?
3/26/2008 6:46:45 PM
Berklee Bill
Berklee Bill writes:
Erin,
If you ever saw my extensive collection of rebel flags and related memoribilia, you'd know I'd not argue the redneck hick moniker (yes, i'm fine with it)
3/26/2008 6:50:15 PM
milhouse
milhouse writes:
yeah in my soul. you can say that again.
3/26/2008 7:12:04 PM
Juice
Juice writes:
Hey Bufalo Bill,
"I agree that hunting just to brag or pound your chest after the kill and not eat the meat or utilize the hides is a waste."

Actually it was a big deal at one time. For a son to be invited to a hunt was an act of becoming a man and it was all about boasting when he got his first kill. He'll be a good provider someday.

Job hunting isn't quite the same. But it does allow you to have someone else do your killing for you. :-)

3/26/2008 7:13:30 PM
Morganic
Morganic writes:
while I do eat meat, wear leather, and enjoy venison, pheasant and wild goose, it's really against my religion (whatever you may call it) to take another creature's life. I just don't feel that I have that right, no matter what you say about over population, etc.

If I buy a steak at the store, that cow 1) is already dead; 2) was raised to be dinner. If I think about it too long I feel bad, but not too bad. Meat is good food.

But, I'm a long time animal lover who feeds squirrels, birds and stray cats, and I simply will not ever kill any living creature other than insects (I do include lobsters, crabs and other shellfish as insects...)

I'd rather feed a deer than harm it. After all, I can go to the store and buy a steak that didn't look at me with those big brown eyes. If I had to kill my own meat I'd likely become a vegetarian.

Plus, I can't even imagine plucking and gutting a chicken! After that I'd have no appetite anyway.
3/26/2008 7:15:34 PM
ACME Music Trio
ACME Music Trio writes:
In My Soul - Are you serious...? Comparing stamp collecting and woodworking in ANY way, shape or form with owning/collecting an ASSAULT RIFLE...? Are you out of your mind?

If someone breaks into your home and steals your stamp collection or your cordless jigsaw... you're bummed. If someone breaks in and steals your automatic assault weapon, then it's in the hands of someone who means harm with it.

We're talking about an item that's SOLE PURPOSE for being designed and manufactured was to KILL other human beings. NOT for target practice... not for hunting... not for collecting... they were created solely for the intent to kill. Not defend.

I am not saying to outlaw all weapons, but you gotta admit that not ALL friggin weapons belong in the general public. I don't care what license you carry or how responsible you are - you do not need to own military-grade assault rifles and they do not need to be available to civilians. You can come-up with any scenario you want... a gang of thugs break into your house with automatic weapons, etc... I still don't buy it. Sorry.

I love to drive... but I cannot legally operate an F1 racer. I cannot purchase a stealth-fighter no matter how much money I have. I may love to dabble in chemistry, but I cannot go buy Uranium or plutonium... there are rules for safety and I fell the NRA has been using "the right to bear arms" as a massive loop-hole to allow weapons that have NO PURPOSE being in the general public, out and available.

I don't know WHERE the line should be drawn... but there needs to be one a LOT closer to run-of-the-mill handguns and rifles.

I'm not for outlawing all guns at ALL... but you're not going to convince me that you should have the "right" to all these over-the-top weapons that have absolutely NOTHING to do with hunting nor personal protection. Sorry.
3/26/2008 7:28:30 PM
Almac77
Almac77 writes:
Gotta love the Live free-my buddy gets pissed at his sisters younger brother in-law and travels to her house when he hears he's around.Chases the kid off the property by blasting buck-shot over the kids head.Then HE calls the cops on the kid saying he's bilking my sister of money.I said "hows your arrest record nowadays".Never been arrested in my life!
3/26/2008 7:29:53 PM
Morganic
Morganic writes:
I tend to agree with Acme, there's a huge difference between having a gun for personal protection and having a machine gun or a bazooka. I'm sorry, but nobody needs a personal grenade launcher.
3/26/2008 7:35:46 PM
Juice
Juice writes:
Morganic?
"it's really against my religion"
That must be an interesting rligion. God less no doubt.

A sacrifical Lamb at one time was considered the highest form of worship although never a requirement.

Christ offered himself as a sacrifice and wasn't even an animal.

It's one thing to value nature and all it's beauty to preserve and maintains it's wonder.

It's quite another to equal it to human morality. It dilutes a human belief that we are different than animals and have no other choice than to be like them.

We can be like them and we can also be not like them by choosing what many refer to religious belief.

Animals have no such option. So who is here to serve who?

Everybody serves sombody or something.

3/26/2008 7:55:19 PM
Juice
Juice writes:
You know to be quite honest, (not that I haven't been already).

But animals used to be how you measured ones wealth. Killing an animal actually developes a huge respect for them and I'll bet most people who do hunt value nature more because they too want an environment for the creatures of the forest to be as fruitful as can be. Chickens that grow up in a box never know what it is like to be a chicken that is free.

Creatures that consume vegetation for the most part are going to consumed by meat eaters. That's their purpose.
Don't you think a creature grown up in the wild had a better life and more natural one than those growm for our slaughter houses? At least they got a chanse to be themselves before they met their ultimate doom of the cycle of life.
3/26/2008 8:04:04 PM
Al
Al writes:
Yeah, but how do we really know that, Juice?... That animals have no such option? That's pretty presumptuous on our part.
I'm serving steak!
3/26/2008 8:05:23 PM
Berklee Bill
Berklee Bill writes:
Juice does raise a good point though. I mean, if you were a lamb back in Biblical times, you were basically fucked.
3/26/2008 8:10:36 PM
Juice
Juice writes:
They don't because it's a well know fact and always has been.

The animal life reference of all time refers to the instinctive aspect of our own fallen nature as human beings.

Animals respond be reaction. Humans can also respond that way but can also premeditate their actions to accomidate a moral lifstyle. Morality is itself the distinction between us and animals.
3/26/2008 8:10:39 PM
Juice
Juice writes:
LOL, Yes Bill sometimes in more ways than one.

Maybe that's where it all started. Those who didn't want to kill lambs made love to them instead. Same end result. Ewe!
3/26/2008 8:15:01 PM
Al
Al writes:
Hardly a well known fact! Science still has no idea what other animals think!
I guess it's just that human arrogance that somehow we're better than they are. Even though we're one of the few animals that shit where they sleep.
3/26/2008 8:15:44 PM
Al
Al writes:
For the record, It's impossble to learn anything about, or ever truly be connected to the world around you, if you somehow feel you're above it all!
3/26/2008 8:18:25 PM
tbass
tbass writes:
does ca-hunting count?
3/26/2008 8:21:12 PM
BarbieK
BarbieK writes:
That's why Al runs with bees. Right, Runs With Bees?
3/26/2008 8:46:18 PM
Juice
Juice writes:
I eat apples AL. But because I do I never feel as though I'm better than an apple. Without food I couldn't exsist.

Without humans Vegtables couldn't exist. Did you ever see wild tomatoes? I never heard of them.

Science is like math. All it proves is something exists. It doesn't define behavior. But we DO know what we think.

You know regardless of what anyones religious belief is. The Bible if nothing else prooves that we are no different in out thinking or struggles than we ever have been. The world around us is the only thing constantly changing but we still remain the same for the most part. We procreate for what we think is fun but we are built to survive and procreation is part of that.

The thought process of animals are not as important as their instync. They are born automatically like a programed machine. There is not much thinking going on. Salmon don't go to school to learn that they need to swim back up stream to lay eggs and die. I'm certain they have no clue what lies ahead of them otherwise they probably wouln't go to die.

Who cares what they are thinking? You don't need science to prove they also suffer from emotional stress because of what lies ahead. Science proves Plants have feelings too.

I'll bet they got a pill for them. :-)
3/26/2008 8:50:57 PM
Almac77
Almac77 writes:
There are a lot people out there who are above it all.Animals(some of them) do feel pain,maybe even emotion,but we are not animals,at least I'm not.I was born in a hospital like human beings do.I've got nothing against animals.I like animals.But,If I was out in the wilderness and the lions(or whatever) attacked me or my family,That high power rifles your best friend now isn't it? Kinda evens the score from the days of ancient Rome!

3/26/2008 8:57:24 PM
Morganic
Morganic writes:
Sorry guys, the one commandment I obey is "Thy Shalt Not Kill."

If you can't give life, you have no right to take it.

Perhaps the "original sin" occurred when man first deviated from eating fruits, vegetables and grains and killed another creature for food. Not that I believe any of that Old Testament stuff anyway. I just honestly feel that I have no right to take another life (other than insects, as I've said.)
3/26/2008 9:12:56 PM